Skip to main content
AI Automation & Systems · Case studies

What ai automation looks like in the real world.

AI agents and n8n workflows that quietly reclaim 20–40 hours a week. Below are example projects where this service moved the business outcome — not just the design.

In one paragraph: what does ai automation look like at Ampex?

AI agents and n8n workflows that quietly reclaim 20–40 hours a week. The engagements below are illustrative ai automation projects shipped by our senior in-house team on a fixed scope and fixed price in Indian Rupees, with reported outcomes drawn from the client's own analytics, ad platforms or CRM. Named client details are shared under NDA once we're at proposal stage.

  • Example · 01D2C skincare brand · Bengaluru

    AI-powered order-to-dispatch system for a D2C skincare brand

    A fast-growing skincare brand selling 200+ orders a day was reconciling Shopify, WhatsApp, and Excel sheets manually — and customers were constantly asking for order updates.

    Results & Impact
    Reduction in manual order entry
    Reduction in manual order entry: 85%
    Fewer WISMO support tickets
    Fewer WISMO support tickets: 60%
    Faster order-to-dispatch time
    Faster order-to-dispatch time: 2.3×
    Recovered from prevented stockouts/month
    Recovered from prevented stockouts/month: ₹2.1L+
    Technologies used
    • Next.js
    • Supabase
    • Shopify API
    • n8n
    • Claude
    • WhatsApp Cloud API
    10 weeks · Fixed scope · fixed priceAsk about this project
    Client industry
    D2C consumer skincare
    Timeline
    10 weeks · Fixed scope · fixed price
    Technology stack
    Next.js, Supabase, Shopify API, n8n, Claude, WhatsApp Cloud API
    Problem

    Orders were arriving from five different channels, but the back-office still ran on spreadsheets. Every morning one team member spent 3+ hours copying orders, checking stock, and updating warehouse status. Inventory was always out of sync, bestsellers went out of stock without warning, and customer support was flooded with 'Where is my order?' messages.

    Objectives
    1. Consolidate orders from all five channels into one operational dashboard.
    2. Cut daily manual order-entry time from 3+ hours to under 30 minutes.
    3. Prevent bestseller stockouts with automated reorder alerts.
    4. Reduce inbound 'Where is my order?' support tickets by more than half.
    Implementation
    1. Week 1 · Discovery

      Mapped every channel, message template, warehouse handoff, and SKU. Documented the current 3-hour morning workflow end-to-end before touching code.

    2. Weeks 2–3 · Data model

      Built a canonical order + inventory schema in Supabase; migrated legacy Shopify SKUs into a mapping table so the operations team never had to relearn part numbers.

    3. Weeks 4–6 · AI intake

      Trained the WhatsApp and Instagram DM parser against 30 days of real customer messages; every extraction had to pass a human review before writing to Shopify.

    4. Weeks 7–8 · Inventory sync

      Wired real-time stock ledger with reorder-point alerts pushed to the founder's WhatsApp.

    5. Weeks 9–10 · Parallel run + cutover

      Ran the new system alongside spreadsheets for two weeks, compared numbers daily, then cut over.

    Challenges encountered
    • Instagram Graph API rate limits forced a batched retry queue for high-DM days around launches.
    • Legacy Shopify SKUs lacked unique barcodes, so a manual mapping pass was needed before automation could be trusted.
    • Warehouse staff on the field had unreliable connectivity — the fulfilment UI needed offline-tolerant states.
    Solutions
    • Unified order management dashboard. WhatsApp and Instagram DMs are captured by AI, validated against live stock, and pushed directly into Shopify and the warehouse sheet — no manual copy-paste.
    • Automated inventory and reorders. Raw-material and finished-goods levels are tracked in real time. Alerts fire when bestsellers hit the reorder point, and purchase suggestions are generated automatically.
    • WhatsApp AI agent for fulfilment. Customers receive proactive order confirmations, dispatch alerts, delivery tracking, and instant return or exchange initiation via WhatsApp.
    Client testimonial

    Not published. This engagement is under NDA. We can arrange a reference call with the client at proposal stage — we do not publish paraphrased or synthesized quotes.

    Lessons learned
    • Start with the messiest channel — WhatsApp — first; it exposes 80% of the edge cases the tidy channels hide.
    • Reorder alerts only work when the operations team already trusts the stock number, so data cleanup pays for itself.
    • Hard guardrails on AI actions (never auto-cancel, never auto-refund) matter more than automation speed.
    Related

    Illustrative workflow example. Named client case studies are shared on request where permitted.

  • Citation-verified research pipelineA judgment PDF is parsed and structured, indexed with hybrid search, verified for citations, and returned as an answer. Stages: Judgment PDF → Parse & structure → Hybrid search → Citation verify → Answer.Judgment PDFParse & structureHybrid searchCitation verifyAnswerCITATION-VERIFIED RESEARCH PIPELINE
    Example · 03Legal-tech SaaS · Delhi NCR

    Citation-verified AI research engine for a legal-tech startup

    A legal-tech startup needed a defensible AI layer over Indian case law without the hallucinated citations that were destroying trust with senior counsel.

    Results & Impact
    Citation accuracy in blind evaluation
    Citation accuracy in blind evaluation: 94%
    Judgments processed automatically
    Judgments processed automatically: 1,200/day
    Reduction in lawyer research time
    Reduction in lawyer research time: 70%
    Enterprise pilots signed post-launch
    Enterprise pilots signed post-launch: 3
    Technologies used
    • Python
    • React
    • PostgreSQL + pgvector
    • GROBID
    • Claude
    16 weeks · MVP to pilot · fixed scopeAsk about this project
    Client industry
    Legal-tech SaaS
    Timeline
    16 weeks · MVP to pilot · fixed scope
    Technology stack
    Python, React, PostgreSQL + pgvector, GROBID, Claude, Supabase
    Problem

    Junior lawyers were spending 8–12 hours per matter manually reading judgments to extract parties, statutes, and precedents. Existing general-purpose LLMs confidently returned wrong citations, which made enterprise clients nervous and stalled paid pilots. The founders needed a system that could cite every answer back to a real paragraph in the source document.

    Objectives
    1. Automate structured extraction of parties, statutes, and holdings from Indian judgments.
    2. Guarantee every AI answer resolves to a real paragraph in the source PDF.
    3. Reach 90%+ citation accuracy in blind evaluation before pilot handover.
    4. Ship a reviewer console so in-house lawyers can correct extractions in-flow.
    Implementation
    1. Weeks 1–2 · Discovery + evaluation set

      Sat with senior counsel to define what a correct citation looks like; built a 500-judgment blind evaluation set before writing pipeline code.

    2. Weeks 3–6 · Ingestion pipeline

      Parsed judgment PDFs with GROBID, structured into parties, statutes, holdings, and paragraphs; loaded into Postgres with pgvector.

    3. Weeks 7–10 · Retrieval + answer engine

      Hybrid BM25 + vector retrieval, followed by a citation-verification step that rejects any claim not anchored to a real paragraph.

    4. Weeks 11–13 · Reviewer console

      Built the lawyer-in-the-loop UI: accept, reject, or correct extractions; corrections feed back into evaluation.

    5. Weeks 14–16 · Pilot hardening

      Ran the blind evaluation with two enterprise buyers, tuned thresholds, and shipped the pilot handover doc.

    Challenges encountered
    • OCR quality on older scanned judgments was poor; a pre-clean step and a per-court PDF quality profile were required.
    • Statute references use inconsistent shorthand across courts, so a normalisation layer had to be maintained by hand initially.
    • Enterprise legal teams wanted a full audit log of every AI decision — added append-only citation logging late in the build.
    Solutions
    • Judgment ingestion pipeline. PDFs are parsed, structured into parties, statutes, holdings, and paragraphs, and indexed with hybrid BM25 + vector search for fast retrieval.
    • Citation-verified answer engine. Every AI-generated claim must anchor to a source paragraph before it is shown to the user — no hallucinated precedents.
    • Lawyer-in-the-loop feedback loop. A reviewer console lets in-house lawyers accept, reject, or correct extractions, with corrections feeding back into model improvement.
    Client testimonial

    Not published. This engagement is under NDA. We can arrange a reference call with the client at proposal stage — we do not publish paraphrased or synthesized quotes.

    Lessons learned
    • In regulated verticals, an auditable citation chain sells more than any raw accuracy number.
    • The evaluation set is the product — write it first, revisit it every fortnight.
    • Lawyer-in-the-loop is not a fallback; it is the reason the system is trustworthy enough to sell.

    Illustrative workflow example. Named client case studies are shared on request where permitted.

Ready to ship ai automation?

Tell us where you're stuck. Get a fixed-scope plan in 48 hours.

Faster leads via WhatsAppFixed pricing in ₹ with GST invoiceReply within 1 working day IST